Amidst continually accelerated change that no living human can be certain is not brink of total demise or of a brand new renaissance, our world; all on it, all it has been and all it ever will be is like the bacteria on the wing of the flea on the back of the dog to the mighty archangels. Though concerned & loving their realm is so vast that an answer from them could seem cold to us with our thimble of knowledge.

In a handful of sessions, communicating with archangels Raphael, Gabriel, Ariel, Michael, Metatron as well as elementals Djinn, Ghob (Ghom, Gob), Nixsa and others, understanding is given to our little dramas. (Angels give the more universal understanding while elementals more the nuts & bolts. It is advised to work with elementals only while in the presence of Archangels. Otherwise, from their lack of the complete picture, elementals could lead one off)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/3023758/Angels-Elementals-the-unborn-a-dialog-with-spirit-beings
http://www.scribd.com/doc/3709945/aborted-souls
http://www.scribd.com/doc/3272035/way-more-than-a-google
http://www.scribd.com/doc/2956824/Ghob-1

We could go on & have ritual after ritual asking every question imaginable but the amount of knowledge the angels could impart is far more than could fit into our little brains. Though interesting, the primary purpose of these communications was for the design and production of alchemical devices. Nevertheless, if any one of you reading this now has burning question you may ask us. If there is no link at the moment check back later for one.

The alchemical devises we are working on are a combination of science & metaphysics. In brief, we believe that the laws of physics hold, however, they have their limitations as scientists themselves discovered over the last century or two. For instance, due to the wave / particle nature of matter it is not possible to know exact properties (Werner Heisenberg, 1927.) The science community considers this an uncertainty and the properties of matter are looked at probabilistically. The laws of physics would still be intact, though, if there was yet a finer rule which determines the details that aggregate these probabilities. Of course, this concern only becomes significant at the subatomic level.

However, 50 years earlier Ludwig Boltzmann in creating statistical physics and the law of entropy (2nd law of Thermodynamics) relied heavily on the probability of states relating to their similitude. In a word or two, Boltzmann's point is that since there are many more possible disordered states than ordered ones, a system will almost always evolve to the state of maximum disorder, usually over a path of adjacently similar states.

However, similitude & measures of disorder depend on one’s reference point, or as we call it the predominant pattern. If one could change this pattern or reference point then would the probabilities of the properties of the states of the system evolve differently? If so, wouldn’t this be further magnified if the composite subatomic probabilities also were evaluated by the same underlying predominant pattern as opposed to pure uncertainty as Heisenberg assumed?

This we believe is not only so but that it is the door of magic, the door of the angels and the door of the Divine. Simple prayer has been shown to do amazing things. Given the laws of physics, how else could this be possible?

For our alchemical device design our interest right now is the door of magic. Or rather, what is called magic. We assume it to be at a cruder level than the door of the Divine but finer than any level achievable through modern science. We are researching this with the aid of metaphysical beings as well as good old experimentation with trial & error. As we do so, we piece together crude theories.

We have also pieced together some alchemical devices or metaphysical lenses that enhance a certain property or modality in its surroundings. There may very well be an uncountable number of properties or modalities that could be focused in this way but the general modality of healing is probably the most urgently needed today. We will soon be offering healing stones made of crystals & hydrates, metals, herbs, oils, and other material fastened together for the intension of healing. We make no claims about the healing of physical ailments, however often people have felt good by holding one. We have noted that, unprompted, folks often have a tendency or urge to put it on their chest just over their heart. Again, we make no claims or promises but some do believe that it seems to heal the heart and dissolve feelings of loneliness. Some have said that it helps in their relationship. Others enjoy the feeling of being satisfied & complete. Some feel able to move forward without being inhibited by old dramas and are pleased how all notice their new self confidence!

To make them available to everyone we will try to keep the price under $100.--. Please check back at this website later.

Lastly, we will openly debate any points we made here.

It is high time for the science community to get off it’s rejection of anything that doesn’t seem to follow the logic of the science community. First of all didn’t Kurt Gödel in 1931 prove that no system of logic can be both complete and consistent? Why then does the science community reject other systems of logic pointing to their inconsistencies or incompleteness when their own system of logic is also either incomplete or inconsistent? Secondly, we have been taught that in the ancient times people would have spiritual reasons for the sorts of things science would later explain. Why did the process of investigating what is considered spiritual abruptly end this last century? Instead, the scientific community of today ignores or disqualifies events and empirical information that only have spiritual explanations instead of trying to understand them. Doesn’t the true scientist consider everything?

As far as the 2nd law is concerned Boltzmann's proof is only rigorous for non-relativistic, non-quantum systems at equilibrium. We do agree that those may be the systems one is most likely to observe at any given time. However, the action of transition clearly involves being out of equilibrium and though a small number of systems may be in transition at any given time, they do account for all the change that has occurred since day one. Therefore any system that we observe must have undergone at least one transition unless, of course, it has somehow managed to remain unchanged since the beginning of the time. Though most of the systems that we observe may be at or close to equilibrium & hence follow the 2nd law they were at some point not at equilibrium and this is the most interesting point because it the result of transitions that accounts for what the system has finally become. Hence, though most systems may be at or near equilibrium their most defining moments were back when they were not near equilibrium.

Secondly, we challenge the definition of order. For example, conventional wisdom would have it that a grove of cloned & identical fir trees perfectly evenly spaced would be more ordered than if the same number of trees were all clumped into one corner. However, according to statistical physics the latter is more ordered because there are a smaller number of permutations possible. Even in disregard of conventional wisdom, let’s say we define order in terms of usable energy, then wouldn’t the former be more useable? More energy would be absorbed by the sun. It would take less energy for a lumberjack to cut them down (He or she would have more space to work, would be able to get more tools in etc…). It would be hard to say what would be more useful for animals in the forest but most would expect more animals to habituate the former as opposed to the latter.

We want to take a moment thank God, or whatever the name may be given to the Supreme Being or Beings that the reader of this may or may not believe. Despite what others may have said, we want you to know They love you whether you believe in Them or not.

Secondly, we wish to thank all the angels, & archangels as well as all the elementals & plant devas & the deva’s of other living beings who have helped us get to this point now. We also wish to thank a handful of humans, both living and dead. Special thanks to the random friends & acquaintances that we know that have help us in the testing of our work.

We also wish to thank people who we do not know and never met. First of all we wish to thank and applaud the late Wilhelm Reich for his dabbling in what he calls “orgone energy.” Lastly, we wish to also thank and applaud Masaru Emoto for his work on the photography of water crystals and his vast set of empirical data that very strongly implies the existence of levels finer than the material level.